• Home
  • Cryptocurrency Market
    • Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investing
    • Venture Capital
  • Blockchain Applications
    • Market
    • DeFi
    • DApps
    • Platforms
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Altcoins
  • Regulations
  • Interviews
  • All Posts
Hot News

Brazil’s “Bitcoin Reserve Bill” Passes Initial Review, Bringing 5% of Foreign Exchange Reserves ($18 Billion) Closer to Purchasing BTC

Jun. 18, 2025

100,000 People Leave Binance Alpha Disappointed: Those Who Suffered Heavy Losses in $ZKJ and $KOGE

Jun. 18, 2025

MEXC Launches “Proof of Trust” Initiative to Ensure Cryptocurrency Security, Auditing, and User Protection

Jun. 18, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
X (Twitter) Telegram
BlockRenaBlockRena
  • Home
  • Cryptocurrency Market
    • Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investing
    • Venture Capital
  • Blockchain Applications
    • Market
    • DeFi
    • DApps
    • Platforms
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Altcoins
  • Regulations
  • Interviews
  • All Posts
Subscribe
BlockRenaBlockRena
Home ยป The Difficulty of LSD Pledge Attack “Destroying Ethereum” Estimated to Cost Billions of Dollars by CoinMetrics
Ethereum

The Difficulty of LSD Pledge Attack “Destroying Ethereum” Estimated to Cost Billions of Dollars by CoinMetrics

Mar. 9, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
The Difficulty of LSD Pledge Attack "Destroying Ethereum" Estimated to Cost Billions of Dollars by CoinMetrics
The Difficulty of LSD Pledge Attack "Destroying Ethereum" Estimated to Cost Billions of Dollars by CoinMetrics
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

According to a study by CoinMetrics researchers @LucasNuzzi, @kylewaters_, and @matiasandroid, it is no longer feasible to launch a 34% attack on the Ethereum blockchain, as it would cost billions of dollars. The study shows that such an attack would require a duration of 8 months and cost over $59 billion, with over 1,000 nodes on AWS and $2 million in expenses.

Many people have expressed concerns about the growing popularity of liquidity staking derivatives (LSD) and their potential threat to the Ethereum network. However, the researchers have demonstrated that launching such an attack is not only time-consuming but also extremely expensive for those attempting to exploit LSD to attack Ethereum. Simulations of Time Consuming Attacks (TCA) show that LSDs cannot purchase access to block templates and attackers would need to buy Ether (ETH) instead.

Due to the dynamic nature of loss constraints, the total cost of attacking Ethereum is difficult to represent as a time series. Unlike Bitcoin, an attack on Ethereum may take multiple days. In terms of capital expenditures, it can be simply defined as a function of the price of Ether and the total amount the attacker must stake. However, in terms of operational expenses, it would depend on the number of active validators at the start of the attack and the long-term costs of cloud computing.

Considering the estimated price of Ether at $2,279, a total locked amount of 28.8 million ETH, and 899,840 validators on December 31, 2023, the researchers estimate that a 34% attack on the network would cost $34.39 billion. If the attack were to start on December 31, 2023, it would take until June 14, 2024, to breach the 33% threshold.

However, with the current rise in ETH price, the cost has become even higher and incredibly astronomical. For example, on March 5, 2024, with the price of Ether at $3,800, a total locked amount of 31.32 million ETH or 978,880 validators, launching a 34% attack on the Ethereum network would cost $59.63 billion. Additionally, if the attacker decides to start the attack today, it would take 265 days, or until November 25, 2024, for the attacker to reach the 33% threshold, as only 1,800 validators are added to the chain daily since the Dencun upgrade.

There have been many assumptions and concerns regarding a 51% attack on Bitcoin and a 34% attack on Ethereum. However, the costs and returns associated with implementing these attacks remain unknown. The researchers propose a novel model to quantify the cost of breaking Byzantine fault tolerance thresholds for Bitcoin and Ethereum. They introduce a new metric called “Total Cost of Attack” (TCA), which includes operational and capital expenditures related to these attacks. They explore the motivations and expected utility of profit-driven and ideology-driven actors.

The research findings indicate that the current security state of Bitcoin and Ethereum makes attacks economically unviable and provide empirical evidence for the game-theoretic equilibrium in these networks. This research also challenges the assumption of a linear relationship between fee income and network security, which is often made when discussing the decline in Bitcoin subsidies. Instead, the findings suggest that block producers engage in speculative behavior before fee cycles, which ultimately enhances network security.

The hope is that this analysis contributes to the discussion on the long-term feasibility of deflationary monetary policies used in Bitcoin and Ethereum and their impact on miner incentives and network security.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Brazil’s “Bitcoin Reserve Bill” Passes Initial Review, Bringing 5% of Foreign Exchange Reserves ($18 Billion) Closer to Purchasing BTC

Jun. 18, 2025

SharpLink Gaming Acquires 176,000 ETH for $460 Million, Yet Stock Price Plummets Nearly 70%

Jun. 14, 2025

“Surge in Institutional Accumulation: Crypto KOL Anthony Pompliano Reportedly Set to Become CEO of ProCapBTC, Aiming to Raise $750 Million All in BTC”

Jun. 14, 2025

MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor: Apple Should Invest in BTC, as It Would Better Stimulate Share Prices than Stock Buybacks

Jun. 11, 2025
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

4 Steps to Efficiently Find Alpha and Organize Smart Money Twitter Accounts on X

Jun. 15, 2025

“Crypto as a Card Table: Winning Strategies in Texas Hold’em and Cryptocurrency Trading – Risk, Decision-Making, and Mindset”

Jun. 15, 2025

a16z: Misconceptions in Cryptocurrency Applications and the Three Distorted Truths

Jun. 13, 2025

The Gambler’s Mindset Ultimately Leads to Loss: Mathematical Analysis Teaches Survival Principles for Investment

Jun. 13, 2025
Latest Posts

ZKEX Secures 25 Million Seed Funding to Build Super DEX MultiChain Decentralized Exchange

Jul. 19, 2024

ZKasino, Suspected of Rug Pull, Announces 1:1 ETH Refund within 72 Hours, Including Return of $ZKAS

May. 29, 2024

Zhu Su’s OPNX Exchange Shuts Down Abruptly! Governance Token $OX Plunges 38%, Urgent Withdrawals Required

Feb. 2, 2024
About Us
About Us

BlockRena is your gateway to the blockchain community, offering a vibrant space where industry insights, innovation, and the latest happenings converge. Explore the ever-growing world of blockchain technology with us.

X (Twitter) Telegram
Hot Category
  • Platforms
  • Altcoins
  • Ethereum
  • Bitcoin
navigation
  • Technology
  • Interviews
  • Regulations
  • Blockchain Applications
  • Cryptocurrency Market
Copyright © 2025 BlockRena. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • Cryptocurrency Market
    • Analysis
    • Exchanges
    • Investing
    • Venture Capital
  • Blockchain Applications
    • Market
    • DeFi
    • DApps
    • Platforms
  • Technology
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Altcoins
  • Regulations
  • Interviews
  • All Posts

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.